Largest Shelter in Minnesota has Disturbingly High Kill Rate

August 20, 2008 at 6:44 pm 7 comments

From CityPages a disturbing report that Minnesotas largest animal shelter killed over 14,000 animals last year – a number representing almost 40% of those they took in.  According to CityPages:

LAST YEAR, the Animal Humane Society, the largest animal welfare organization in Minnesota, accepted 36,378 living creatures into its shelters—and killed 14,610 of them.

AHS euthanizes about 40 percent of the animals it takes in. The vast majority of the dead animals—94 percent—are dogs and cats. They are brought to AHS for any number of reasons. They are found abandoned on the side of the road or roaming feral in empty fields. Their owners are relocating to a place where pets aren’t allowed. Family dynamics have changed—a new baby was born, there was a divorce—and the animal had to go. Lassie was too expensive to care for, and Puffball couldn’t be housebroken. Irresponsible owners and pet breeders ended up with litters of unwanted puppies and kittens.

AHS accepts every animal brought to its facility.  Some owners bring animals there specifically to have them euthanized.  Still — it’s difficult for me to believe that 14,610 cats and dogs were either surrendered for euthanasia or were too ill or aggressive to be adopted out.  Shelter management states that their open door policy puts them in a position where a high kill rate is unavoidable but:

Critics, however, say that’s not true. While sympathetic to AHS’s situation, many animal welfare groups in the Twin Cities say AHS’s euthanasia rate is just too high. They say AHS does not invest enough in animal health care and training, which would put more animals on the adoption floor, and that it is too focused on self-preservation and fundraising to attack the biggest cause of homeless pets: animal overpopulation.


AHS’s policies have created a schism in the animal welfare community. Proponents of the so-called no-kill approach contend that the shelter should take much more aggressive steps to prevent animal deaths. In the Twin Cities, former AHS volunteers and employees now staff many of the no-kill rescue groups. Several say they left AHS because of the excessive killing, and each has stories about animals they would have saved.

For the last year, volunteers at AHS have formed discussion groups at each of AHS’s five locations, insisting on reform, says one volunteer who wishes to remain anonymous.

“If we don’t say anything, the animals suffer. If we do, we’ll be let go and they’ll suffer more. We took our ideas all the way to senior management and they blew us off. They said, ‘Great. We’ll look into it,’ and we never heard from them again.”

Nathan Winograd is a no-kill advocate and the author of “Redemption The Myth of Pet Overpopulation and the No-Kill Revolution in America.”  On his NoKillBlog, Winograd writes about the problems many shelters have in collaborating with other rescue groups:

Collaboration does not work because lack of collaboration is not why animals are being killed. Because it never was about getting along or not getting along. Often, it isn’t even about the money. It’s about the No Kill Equation model and those whose job it is to implement the model, but refuse to do so. It is about the shelter directors. Because at the end of the day, what we are suffering from, what is truly killing animals in U.S. shelters is an overpopulation of shelter directors content with the status quo and mired in the failed philosophies of the past.

 And indeed, it appears that AHS is mired in that past.  Again from CityPages:

CRITICS OF AHS’S high kill rates say the organization has been reluctant to adopt new trends in animal welfare that have dramatically reduced euthanasia in other states. Several open-door shelters nationwide—starting in 1994 in San Francisco and most recently in Tompkins County, New York; Charlottesville, Virginia; and Reno, Nevada—have been able to reach save rates for dogs and cats in the high 80 and low 90 percentiles, using the no-kill model put forth by Nathan Winograd, author of Redemption: The Myth of Pet Overpopulation and the No Kill Revolution in America. Winograd’s formula for success includes increased community involvement, close partnerships between welfare agencies, and specific programs such as high-volume, low-cost spaying and neutering and a controversial trap, neuter, and release (TNR) effort targeting feral cats.

It is the responsibility of every animal welfare organization to use all the tools available to save animals, says Winograd, who refers to shelters with high kill rates as “assembly lines of death.” We are a nation obsessed with pets, the former criminal defense attorney and shelter director argues. Every year Americans spend $40 billion on their pets and millions more donating to animal welfare charities. Yet “the reality is that 70 percent of cats and 40 to 50 percent of dogs nationwide end up in landfills instead of in the loving home of a family,” he says . “It doesn’t make sense.”

No, it doesn’t make sense.  I understand that shelters have limited capacity, overstressed and overworked staff, limited budgets and — as a trainer who works with problem dogs — I understand the importance of temperament testing and training.  But with a kill rate of 40% I have to wonder why AHS seems to be out looking for “puppy mills” to close down and seize the animals from and why they aren’t working more cooperatively with other local rescue groups.  And, according to the CityPages article, AHS is not interested in collaboration:

AHS detractors also complain that the organization doesn’t cooperate with other agencies to reduce the need for euthanasia. Many times, Salter says, she watched AHS turn down offers from other rescue groups willing to take animals scheduled to be put down. So far this year, AHS has placed only 43 dogs and four cats with other rescue groups, despite euthanasia rates in the thousands. “If they couldn’t place them, why not allow other willing groups to place them?” Salter asks.

In 2006, 14 animal welfare groups, including the Twin Cities’ municipal animal control facilities and Animal Ark, joined together to reduce kill rates and overpopulation by allowing rescue groups to take in animals scheduled for euthanasia at open-door shelters. AHS refused to join.

Do you live in the Twin Cities area?  If you do, and you support the no-kill philosophy, we suggest you do careful research before you provide financial or volunteer support to a shelter group.  I know that I’d prefer my hard-earned dollars go to a dedicated no-kill group like the Animal Ark than to a high kill facility like AHS.


Entry filed under: dogs, minnesota, pets, rescue. Tags: , .

Is PeTa Running For the Border? Is it the Dogzzzzzz Fault?

7 Comments Add your own

  • 1. MillDogMommy  |  January 7, 2009 at 10:26 pm

    14,000, where I live our animal care and control put down 43,000 last year, another reason why people should stop “Buying ” their dogs from pet stores, that get the dogs from puppy mills also known as commercil breeding facilities and ADOPT DONT SHOP, and SPAY/NEUTER YOUR PETS

  • 2. Gina from Maplewood  |  January 29, 2009 at 6:42 pm

    I’m a former HS volunteer who left because of differences in philosophy. However don’t believe that Animal Ark is a perfect place either. I have talked with many people over the years that had bad experiences adopting aggressive or extremely fearful dogs from the Ark and other low/no kill rescues. That isn’t a good thing either. I live with several “project” dogs and it is an exhausting endeavor which few can handle. My next dog will be “normal”.

  • 3. julias  |  September 18, 2011 at 8:27 pm

    First off all pitbulls should be band from the united states. (personal opinion) second off i totally agree about the human society kills way to many dogs. those poor dogs should be spared the pain of using the “BLUE JUICE” and use a bullet. i know sounds inhumane but to be honest they would feel NO pain! Rice county H.S. kills alot of dogs. I know of a lady that wanted to adopt a very sweet dog and because she was on schedual to be euthanized they would not let her adopt her. But with all the healthy animals, why did the rescues spend so much money to try and save all the cats and dogs from Katrina and such or disasters and keep begging for money. I just wanted to give my own personal opinion, thanks for reading. Hope other people can start giving their HONEST opinions not just following the crowd.

  • 4. Nicole  |  September 8, 2012 at 6:36 pm

    no offense julias, but banning all pit bulls would mean putting down dogs that shouldn’t be. theres a video on facebook about a pit bull saving some random starnger from an abusive husband second my neighbors’ pit bull is so well behaved he can be trusted with their 2yo grandson alone in a room. pit bulls aren’t for everyone though.

  • 5. Debbie  |  October 6, 2012 at 6:20 pm

    My daughter has 2 pitbulls which at 1st scared me but they r the sweetest dogs even have more patience than my peek a poo and black lab !

  • 6. Maggie  |  January 13, 2013 at 12:58 pm

    My friend has a gorgeous pitpul and has for years my collie plays rougher with him and just rolls around loving it. They play together not fight! People that are against pit bulls have absolutely no experience raising one and should know any animal can act out like animals do! Ridiculous how people are soooo closed off in their little worlds they believe they have the right to pass judgement on matters they don’t have a clue about!

  • 7. Toni  |  February 4, 2014 at 11:46 pm

    Leave those pit bulls alne, they are one of the best dogs I know of. I had 2of them, they were just big loving dogs. I had a little havanese, dog for about six months, I returned him. Beacuse he was so aggressive, towards people.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

Trackback this post  |  Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed

Because A Dog’s Mind is a Terrible Thing to Waste


Copyright notice

All original content on this Web site is copyright © on the date of publication by this author. All rights reserved except, of course, that others may quote from original content under the 'Fair Use' provisions of US copyright law.

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 283 other followers

Recent Comments

lynellex on House of Horrors
Mary on I Hate Jon Katz Too
Susie on I Hate Jon Katz Too
Susan Jaffe on See no evil. Read no evil. Cit…
Top Dog Blog
Featured in Alltop


Add to Technorati Favorites
Dog Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
blogarama - the blog directory
Blog Directory
Blog Directory & Search engine
August 2008
« Jul   Sep »

%d bloggers like this: