Pets as Indicator Species for the Domestic Environment

August 19, 2008 at 7:05 pm 2 comments

Certain species of plants and animals are characteristic of various natural and man-made communities.  Biological indicator species can provide valuable diagnostic information on the state of biological conditions in the community they live in.  Disturbances to the community from natural or man-made events will affect the health, behavior and distribution of its indicator species.  Indicator species can therefore act provide an early warning of degradation in an ecosystem and as measures of general environmental quality.

 

Many researchers are currently conducting studies to assess which species of animals or plants best act as sentinels for different types of contaminants in specific kinds of environments. This week the Santa Rosa Press Democrat published an interesting article titled Green Living With Pets in Mind.  The author noted that the indoor environment of our modern homes may be a less healthy place for our pets to live than we believe it is and wondered if they may be acting, in effect, as indicator species for the modern human domestic environment.

Scientists often cite our companion animals as “canaries in the coal mine.” Household environmental toxins can be a major concern. According to a report from Environmental Working Group (EWG), industrial chemicals show up in our pets at even higher rates than the average human, The chemicals most detected were stain and grease proof coatings and flame retardants used in furniture and flooring.

“At the forefront of people’s minds is if a home is pet friendly, then more importantly it will be human friendly,” says Andy Bannister of Earthtone Construction in Sebastopol. He says it makes sense that if animals are more susceptible to the toxins often contained in building materials, making it safe for them will make it safe for the human occupants.

Our house pets live their lives in much more intimate contact with the chemically treated and – or contaminated surfaces in our home than we do.  Not only are they in regular contact with floors, lawns, furniture and indoor air – they regularly lick and groom their feet and fur and often eat things off the ground or floor.  In many modern homes, housepets often also spend a lot more time in the house and/or yard than their owners do.  This more constant and intimate contact with potential toxins in our homes and yards may mean that our pets will be adversely affected by them before we are.

In fact, the University of Montana Center for Environmental Health Services recently published reports on the potential for using domestic cats as indicator species for indoor air quality and dogs for conditions that may dispose them (and us) to bone cancer.  

There are many advantages to using a sentinel species as indicators of human health hazards. Animals share the human environment, and are therefore exposed to many of the same dangers as humans. They often consume the same foods or water as humans and breathe the same air. Animal species and humans often react to many toxic agents in similar ways, and regularly respond to the toxins by developing comparable diseases.

However, animals usually develop environmentally induced pathological conditions more rapidly than humans. Because animals generally have a shorter lifespan than humans, their diseases progress more rapidly and their susceptibility to toxic chemicals can increase more readily. Sentinel animals can provide an early warning of potential risks to humans before the human population is actually effected. All of these factors show the potential value of sentinel species; they can provide early warning of situations which may require further study, and can also suggest potential causes and effects.

Virtually every type of cancer seen in humans also occurs in pets — and the incidence of cancer we see in our pets is on the rise.  We don’t yet know the reason for this disturbing trend though I suspect there are several factors involved.

First is the greatly improved diagnostic abilities in veterinary medicine. Cases would have gone undiagnosed a few years ago can now be diagnosed with equipment and tests that weren’t previously available.  Another related factor is the increasing sophistication of pet owners regarding health problems.  Pet owners may be better educated today about the importance of early diagnosis and treatment and may be apt to notice more subtle physical and behavioral changes than we did in the past.

Unfortunately, it’s also likely that environmental factors have also led to the observed increase in cancer diagnoses in our pets. Since we are afflicted with the same types of cancers and other environmental diseases that our pets are — it may be reasonable to assume that they are a valuable indicator species for our domestic environments and to use more caution in the products we bring into contact with their lives — and ours.

About these ads

Entry filed under: dogs, health, pets, science. Tags: , , .

Dog Cloning, Mormon Kidnapping Former Beauty Queen also Sought on Bizarre Theft Charges Is PeTa Running For the Border?

2 Comments Add your own

  • 1. Audie's Gramma  |  August 19, 2008 at 8:21 pm

    When we bought our first house (12 years ago), we told the realtor that we didn’t want one in a neighborhood of “nice lawns.”

    It’s not JUST that we wanted to be free to pursue our hillbilly landscaping plans without offending Mrs. Grundy.

    Ken had found an epidemiological paper shortly before that studied rates of a particular cancer in dogs (a canine analog to a common childhood cancer), comparing dogs who lived in homes that used chemical pesticides on the lawn to those whose owners did not. It also looked at the contiguity effect — dogs living in homes where the next-door neighbors used lawn chemicals. The control was dogs that had no immediate exposure to lawn chemicals.

    The rates were astronomically higher for the dogs who lived on the poisoned lawns, and significantly higher for dogs who merely lived next-door to the poisoned lawns.

    Case closed for us. Grass-worshippers are free to enjoy their golf greens and their cancer. I’ll live with dandelions, thanks.

  • 2. Children as “Indicator Species”? « Smartdogs’ Weblog  |  September 7, 2008 at 5:54 pm

    [...] I was caught up in an odd fit of presentiment when I wrote that post three weeks ago about pets as indicator species for the domestic environment.  This week, as reported widely on the web, the results of a study [...]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Trackback this post  |  Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed


Because A Dog’s Mind is a Terrible Thing to Waste

RSS

Copyright notice

All original content on this Web site is copyright © on the date of publication by this author. All rights reserved except, of course, that others may quote from original content under the 'Fair Use' provisions of US copyright law.

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 270 other followers

Top Dog Blog
Featured in Alltop
ResearchBlogging.org

sitemeter

Add to Technorati Favorites
Dog Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
blogarama - the blog directory
Blog Directory
Blog Directory & Search engine
August 2008
M T W T F S S
« Jul   Sep »
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 270 other followers

%d bloggers like this: