The Threat is Real

February 14, 2008 at 6:04 am 8 comments

killergolden.jpg 

And it isn’t from vicious, baby-killing pibbles….. 

Today Steve Salerno from http://www.skeptic.com published a wonderfully entertaining and insightful article about how our deeply flawed system of broadcast journalism habitually takes odd, random occurrences and uses them to manufacture epidemics designed to terrify the mindless hordes who still take what they see and read in the news at face value. 

In Mr. Salerno’s words, “by definition, journalism in its most basic form deals with what life is not.  By painting life in terms of its oddities, journalism yields not a snapshot of your world, but something closer to a photographic negative.” 

Instead of actually taking the time and effort to <gawd forbid> research a story, media pundits bent on achieving celebrity status at any cost manufacture stories using sound-bites, anecdotes, pointless opinion polls, twisted statistics and information culled from “experts” who are focused more on advancing personal agendas than in presenting accurate data. 

According to Salerno, “Nowhere are these foibles more noticeable — or more of a threat to journalistic integrity — than when they coalesce into a cause: so-called “advocacy” or “social” journalism. To begin with, there are legitimate questions about whether journalism should even have causes.  Worse, for our purposes, the data on which journalists premise their crusades are drawn from the same marginalia discussed above.  Just as journalists who run out of news may create it, journalists who run out of real causes may invent them. It’s not hard to do. All you need is a fact or two, which you then “contextualize” with more so-called expert opinion.” 

So what’s the panic du jour?  

Well, according to Jim Crosby at canineaggression.blogspot.com  a new record was set when 33 people were killed by dogs in 2007.  Most of the fatal attacks were made by unsupervised sexually intact dogs.  A record I’m sure some twit in the media will spin into “an epidemic” that animal rights advocates will use to try to put yet more limits on pet ownership. 

I think that Mr. Crosby is spot on when he says, “What I see these numbers indicating, based on my on-scene investigations, is that irresponsible owners tend not to spay and neuter, tend to chain their animals out for extended times with little or no socialization, and that Pits are currently popular with owners who maintain their animals with less wisdom and care than most of us. Once again, it’s the two-legged problem behind the four-legger that precipitates the problems.” 

Amen brother.   

And sad to say, instead of listening to voices of reason (how pointlessly boring would THAT be), the folks we’ve elected to serve us in cities, counties and states across the country are swallowing the twisted, self-serving media hype hook, line and stinker. 

According to my friend at caveat.blogware.com, Aurora, Colorado enacted a breed ban in 2005 largely as a knee-jerk response to the reinstatement of the adjacent City of Denver’s breed ban. She goes on to say, ‘City Councilmember Bob Fitzgerald explained the need for a citywide pit bull ban thus: “We don’t want ‘those people’ here.” ‘ 

O-kay… Just who are ‘those people’ Bob Fitzgerald wants to keep out?  If he wants to limit the kinds of people who can live in Aurora, why can’t he leave innocent dogs out of the equation and pass a law limiting residency in the city to law-abiding heterosexual white people with above-average incomes who drive hybrid cars and drink merlot? 

Watch out for the coming storm.  The media will be digging their ugly little claws into these statistics soon, and dog owners across the country had better be ready to get mauled.

About these ads

Entry filed under: bsl, bull breeds, dogs, pit bull, pit bulls, pitbull, pitbulls. Tags: , , , , .

Dog Jack – Pitbull War Hero Scottish Pooparazzi

8 Comments Add your own

  • 1. Caveat  |  February 14, 2008 at 1:45 pm

    I wasn’t happy with Jim’s statements at the time and said so. I probably overreacted due to my ingrained paranoia these days but I don’t think that such a statistically rare event can be predictive of any kind of trend.

    That said, I agree that it shouldn’t be long before the spin begins!

  • 2. Fuzzy Logic  |  February 14, 2008 at 1:56 pm

    aw crap.. just what we need.

  • 3. Carol  |  February 14, 2008 at 3:27 pm

    pass a law limiting residency in the city to law-abiding heterosexual white people with above-average incomes who drive hybrid cars and drink merlot

    And it’s ironic that none of the politicos or media wankers ever find it conceivable that people ‘like that’ could own Pit Bulls – and yet that describes a good proportion of the Pit Bull owners I know personally. Well, other than the hetrosexual and white parts.

  • 4. SmartDogs  |  February 14, 2008 at 11:51 pm

    Caveat, I agree that the increase in fatalities doesn’t look like it is statistically significant, and one number certainly doesn’t make a trend (at least outside the mainstream news media).

    But, yeah. That spin. Just imagine what would happen if we could harness it to create energy instead of evil.

  • 5. John  |  February 15, 2008 at 10:56 am

    Keep up the good work.

    John

    http://www.royaltalent.com

  • 6. CeliaSue  |  February 17, 2008 at 6:17 pm

    mad dogs, dog fights and such sell newspapers… media is a business, their product is news… and news is subjective… people wanna read about danger, epidemics, violence, dog fights? gets the adrenaline going… fear… fear… fear… be fraid be very afraid… of your neighbor, of your neighbor’s dog… of the terrorists, of the terrorists dogs…

    Pit Bulls and Dogfights Sell Papers

    http://thebark.typepad.com/

    http://www.squidoo.com/polkadotpitbull

  • 7. Are we Afraid of Nature? « Smartdogs’ Weblog  |  February 18, 2008 at 3:47 pm

    [...] that we have a media more interested in making news than reporting it, the concept of ‘stranger danger’ (much like that of killer pibbles) has been blown utterly out [...]

  • 8. CeliaSue  |  February 29, 2008 at 10:08 am

    i just reread this… it’s hysterical… so funny, think I’ll write something…

    why can’t he leave innocent dogs out of the equation and pass a law limiting residency in the city to law-abiding heterosexual white people with above-average incomes who drive hybrid cars and drink merlot?

    did I mention that I am a freelance reporter/editor and I own a pitbull… so there you go.. media are people, too…

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Trackback this post  |  Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed


Because A Dog’s Mind is a Terrible Thing to Waste

RSS

Copyright notice

All original content on this Web site is copyright © on the date of publication by this author. All rights reserved except, of course, that others may quote from original content under the 'Fair Use' provisions of US copyright law.

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 272 other followers

Top Dog Blog
Featured in Alltop
ResearchBlogging.org

sitemeter

Add to Technorati Favorites
Dog Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory
blogarama - the blog directory
Blog Directory
Blog Directory & Search engine
February 2008
M T W T F S S
« Jan   Mar »
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
2526272829  

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 272 other followers

%d bloggers like this: